Oscar Talk!, or, Just Another Day Here at The L Magazine's YourBlogAbout Juno-Induced Fits of Apoplexy and Impotent Rage and Existential Angst

Filed Under: Film

Oh, so the Academy Award nominations came out this morning. I'd preface this post with "not that it really matters," except that that would be a lie: every year, highbrow critics bunch their panties about the Oscars, only to claim that it doesn't really matter, of course. There's a bit of a contradiction there, methinks.

Yeah, it's studio politics and horse racing and rarely if ever reflects the year's significant contributions to film culture (in most consequential ways, the NYFF selection is a better bellwether). But there's a VHS-raised suburban movie nerd deep (or not so deep) inside every eloquent snob (I mean that as a compliment) decrying the limp Best Foreign Film selection, so this time every year we all hope, irrationally, for the best possible slate of nominees. "The best possible slate of nominees" meaning, of course, the one that leaves us jarred as little as possible by the disjunction between what we admire most about contemporary film culture, and what the rest of the world does.

So right away, it's rather disheartening to know that, despite the exhortations of a whole professional class, who take their jobs and their love of movies really seriously, and believe in the role of the critic in an enlightened society that values discourse regarding the arts... everybody really, really likes Juno. Ugh, Diablo Cody was nominated for her backstory, and also for unloading her storehouse of quips onto a script that panders to "indie" culture and then moralizes about it (and creates some kind of conservative fantasy world where sex ed and birth control either doesn't exist, or are rejected with a joke). And it's also apparently one of the five best movies released this year; that or the stampede towards over this year's designated lovable underdog has gotten way out of hand (I vote for the latter). If There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men split the smart-person vote, and Juno actually wins, I will understand, even better than I do now, how the Unabomber felt in his cabin all those years.

Sorry. That was more time than I had hoped to have to spend thinking about that movie any more. Although Ellen Page is very good in it and good for her. Elsewhere, I basically feel the same way about the nominations as anybody else does, namely glad to see a bit of recognition given to some people whose work I admire. I'll single out Roger Deakins, for a couple decades one of our best, most versatile cinematographers — so versatile, in fact, that he was nominated for shooting two different movies, and will as a consequence win for neither of them. Also, Sarah Polley — nominated for her Away from Her script, adapted from Alice Munro's "The Bear Came Over the Mountain" — continues to be lauded for, basically, having really really good taste in short fiction, and really I think it's nice to see us prioritizing something like that for once.

Comments

Posted by 
Wajda's Katyn was nominated for best foreign language flick, so I'm pretty excited about that. Haven't seen it yet, so can't say how good it is, although the reviews in Poland were pretty mixed, if I remember right. Which could be good or bad thing, I mean people praise Pirates of the Caribbean too and I could barely stand that movie.

If Juno wins I will laugh.
Posted by 
It's interesting that you mention the mixed reviews for Katyn: whichever Polish organization picks their country's entry into the Oscar horse race probably picked it at least partly because Wajda is, according to the Academy, the only working filmmaker in Eastern Europe — the winner of an honorary Oscar back in the 90s, and the possessor of some pretty serious name recognition. And it paid off, as now the Polish film industry gets a little (very little) extra attention.

All of which (and also, as the above-linked Reverse Shot post points out, the similarly reasoned entries of previous winners Tornatore, Mikhalkov, Arcand) is merely to illustrate the absurdity of the Foreign-language Feature nomination process, and perhaps the absurdity of the Amerian film dinosaur of record attempting to wade into the swift currents of international cinema, period.

Also, Juno can suck a fuck.
Posted by 
Yeah from what I read in the Polish press, the nominating committe at the time said they picked it 1. based on name recognition and 2. theme of the movie ("a big important movie telling story of Katyn forest for the first time on screen").

Also from reviews, it seems a 3/5 (fine but flawed) mainly Im seeing "type" characters, didactic texts, and theatrical acting, although there's some high praise too there, classical structure of it, someone compared it to Sophocles' Antigone in themes.

Btw- this is front page headline news over there, although I think some people are delusional in thinking this will now get a wide release in USA. Maybe Sundance channel might pick it up for cable release.

This was the other logical choice they could have went with, Sztuczki (Tricks) which was well received at festivals: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1094278/awards

But in retrospect they had to pick this, considering Wajda is a legend (in Poland at least), this might be his last movie (up there in age), and the true story this movie tells.

ok, back to your blog...
Name
URL (remove the http://)
Email
Comments
   
TrackBack Link
Return to listings

contact | site credits